The Supreme Court

home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search

/ The Supreme Court / The Supreme Court.iso / pc / ascii / 1992 / order / 060192.zor < prev next >

Wrap

Text File | 1992-05-31 | 14.8 KB | 532 lines

ORDER LIST MONDAY, JUNE 1, 1992 APPEAL -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION 91-1615 TURNER, JESSE, ET AL. V. ARKANSAS, ET AL. The judgment is affirmed. Justice White and Justice Blackmun would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral argument. ORDERS IN PENDING CASES No. --- JANE DOE V. UNITED STATES The motion of petitioner for leave to file a petition for a writ of certioari under seal is denied. Petitioner may file a redacted petition for a writ of certiorari on or before June 19, 1992. D-1089 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF BRUCE D. WELLMAN It having been reported to the Court that Bruce D. Wellman, of Dixon, Illinois, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Illinois and this Court by order of March 2, 1992, having suspended the said Bruce D. Wellman from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued; It is ordered that the said Bruce D. Wellman be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1096 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MAX CARLETON GARRICK, JR. It having been reported to the Court that Max Carleton Garrick, Jr., of Whittier, California, has resigned from the practice of law before the Supreme Court of California and this Court by order of March 23, 1992, having suspended the said Max Carleton Garrick, Jr., from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Max Carleton Garrick, Jr., be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1102 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF KURT R. CONNER It having been reported to the Court that Kurt R. Conner, of North Wilkesboro, North Carolina, has been suspended from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of North Carolina and this Court by order of March 30, 1992, having suspended the said Kurt R. Conner from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Kurt R. Conner be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1107 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROBERT B. CHATZ It having been reported to the Court that Robert B. Chatz, of Northbrook, Illinois, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Illinois and this Court by order of April 6, 1992, having suspended the said Robert B. Chatz from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Robert B. Chatz be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1129 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DAVID PAUL SMITH It is ordered that David Paul Smith, of Englewood, Colorado, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1130 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JAMES R. BANDY It is ordered that James R. Bandy, of River Rouge, Michigan, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. 65 ORIG. TEXAS V. NEW MEXICO The motion of the River Master for approval of fees and expenses is granted and the River Master is awarded $4,208.44 for the period January 1 - March 31, 1992, to be paid equally by the parties. 91-794 HARPER, HENRY, ET AL. V. VIRGINIA DEPT. OF TAXATION The order granting certiorari entered on May 18, 1992 is amended to read as follows: The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition. 91-1780 COLORADO V. GASKINS, JOHN H. (A-669) The application for stay addressed to Justice Scalia and referred to the Court is denied. 91-1862 GANTT, DAVID, ETC., ET AL. V. SKELOS, DEAN, ETC., ET AL. The motion of appellants to expedite consideration of the appeal is denied. 91-7925 YAGOW, MORRIS V. MUSICH, VERNA, ET AL. The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until June 22, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court. Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens, dissenting: For the reasons expressed in Brown v. Herald Co., Inc., 464 U.S. 928 (1983), we would deny the petition for a writ of certiorari without reaching the merits of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis. APPEAL -- JURISDICTION NOTED 91-1618 VOINOVICH, GOV. OF OHIO V. QUILTER, BARNEY, ET AL. In this case probable jurisdiction is noted. CERTIORARI DENIED 91-383 PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF REV. V. BLOOMINGDALE'S BY MAIL, LTD. 91-664 MILLS, AVERY V. UNITED STATES 91-1284 INTL. BHD., LOCAL 111 V. CO-UTE ELEC., ET AL. 91-1324 ) CONSOL PENNSYLVANIA COAL CO. V. HUGHES, JAMES, ET AL. ) 91-1561 ) HUGHES, JAMES, ET AL. V. CONSOL PENNSYLVANIA COAL CO. ) 91-1681 ) POLLOCK, EWING, ET AL. V. HUGHES, JAMES E., ET AL. 91-1366 DARTEZ, JAMES, ET AL. V. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., ET AL. 91-1380 DAVID, SHMUEL V. UNITED STATES 91-1441 SHWC, INC., ET AL. V. FDIC, ETC. 91-1452 CHICAGO TRIBUNE CO. V. NLRB, ET AL. 91-1463 SWORDS, LEONORA, ET AL. V. FED. S&L INS. CORP. 91-1483 IDAHO V. DOE, ET AL. 91-1497 ) JOINER, JIM, ET AL. V. ROBERTS, JIM, ET AL. ) 91-1648 ) ROBERTS, JIM, ET AL. V. JOINER, JIM, ET AL. 91-1587 TONEY, ANTHONY J. V. ALABAMA 91-1604 WEIDMAN, RICHARD, ET AL. V. WEIDMAN, WILLIAM 91-1608 ) WINSTON, SAMUEL, ET AL. V. CHILDREN & YOUTH SERV. ) 91-1669 ) CHILDREN & YOUTH SERV. V. WINSTON, SAMUEL, ET AL. 91-1609 ANIS, MAGDY V. NJ COMM. ON ATTY. ADV. 91-1610 ) JENNINGS, WILLIAM F. V. JOSHUA INDEPEND. SCH., ET AL. ) 91-1611 ) GLADDEN, DON V. JOSHUA INDEPEND. SCH., ET AL. 91-1612 THOMAS, MARY V. HOFFMANN-LaROCHE, INC., 91-1616 POTTER, ROBERT O. V. CALIFORNIA 91-1624 KOLOKOFF, LLOYD, ET UX. V. UNITED STATES 91-1625 CAIN PARTNERSHIP, LTD. V. PIONEER INVEST. SERV. 91-1630 KING, ROBERT E. V. NCNB TEXAS NAT. BANK, ET AL. 91-1631 ST. MARY'S HOSPITAL V. ARKANSAS BLUE CROSS/SHIELD 91-1637 ALFRED, GURNEY V. UNITED PARCEL SERV., ET AL. 91-1638 EVANS, EDDIE V. CITY OF TULSA 91-1639 NELSON, MICHAEL A. V. OFFICE OF SAM NUNN 91-1643 ) SIMON WIESENTHAL CTR., ET AL V. McCALDEN, VIVIANA ) 91-1699 ) McCALDEN, VIVIANA V. SIMON WIESENTHAL CTR., ET AL. 91-1652 REYES, IGNACIA D., ET AL. V. UNITED STATES 91-1653 H. J., INC., ET AL. V. NORTHWESTERN BELL TEL. CO. 91-1662 JADER FUEL CO. V. WILLIAMS, BILLIE 91-1676 KNIGIN, KENNETH S. V. MANGANO, GUY J., ETC. ET AL. 91-1683 POLYAK, EARLENE V. HULEN, FRANK, ET AL. 91-1685 TIMMS, ESTELLA V. COUGHLIN, MICHAEL 91-1722 BARROW, WILLIAM D. V. UNITED STATES 91-1734 BERRIDGE, PAUL J., ET UX. V. UNITED STATES 91-1764 CUDA, THOMAS, ET UX. V. UNITED STATES 91-5465 PATTAN, JOSEPH V. UNITED STATES 91-7274 WILLIAMS, TERRANCE V. UNITED STATES 91-7316 MARTINI, ROBERT JOHN V. UNITED STATES 91-7500 McGEARY, EDWARD B. V. UNITED STATES 91-7530 REVELS, SHARMELLA V. UNITED STATES 91-7545 ) NAGI, TOUFIC V. UNITED STATES ) 91-7564 ) BARASH, ROBERT F. V. UNITED STATES 91-7546 RYAN, JOHN C. V. U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE 91-7555 KITCHENS, WILLIAM J. V. TEXAS 91-7569 DAMRON, KENNETH M. V. UNITED STATES 91-7593 EDGAR, BETTY V. UNITED STATES 91-7603 BENTSON, STEPHEN V. UNITED STATES 91-7766 HALL, LAUREN V. TURNAGE, THOMAS 91-7767 FRALEY, DENNIS V. CHARLES ROBERTS GANG, ET AL. 91-7839 FRANCHI, THOMAS C. V. UNITED STATES 91-7851 COFIELD, PAUL E. V. OPM 91-7886 TUCKER, JAMES V. BORGERT, WARDEN 91-7889 GRANT, BRUCE C. V. INDIANA 91-7890 KRAUL, KARL, ET AL. V. MAINE BONDING & CASUALTY CO. 91-7891 SMITH, RICHARD T. V. OKLAHOMA 91-7893 STOIANOFF, CARROLL V. FRANCIS, ARTHUR, ET AL. 91-7897 MORRISON, DERRIC V. MISSOURI, ET AL. 91-7902 THOMAS, CARL S. V. BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS 91-7908 GARCIA, LUIS A. V. CALIFORNIA 91-7909 KINNEY, GREGORY N. V. INDIANA YOUTH CENTER, ET AL. 91-7910 GRIFFIN, DAVID B. V. WILLIAMS, K. K., ET AL. 91-7916 ROTT, VIRGIL V. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE 91-7918 CONWAY-EL, GERALD L. V. JONES, SUPT. 91-7923 JONES, EDWIN L. V. INDIANAPOLIS POLICE, ET AL. 91-7924 TAYLOR, JOSEPH V. DUCKWORTH, WARDEN, ET AL. 91-7927 THOMAS-EL, GHEMELLE V. MISSOURI 91-7931 MERCIER, HARRY E. V. TRIPPETT, WARDEN 91-7937 MONTGOMERY, ERNEST V. WELLS, WARDEN 91-7939 TURNER, REGINALD E. V. OKLAHOMA 91-7942 GARNER, SIM V. ROTH, WARDEN 91-7949 ESPENSHADE, DONALD V. PHILADELPHIA HIGHER ED. AGENCY 91-7950 ANDRISANI, ALBERT V. VOGEL, MIRIAM A., ET AL. 91-7953 ROY, MICHAEL V. SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPT. 91-7954 CHASE, NORMAN K. V. OREGON 91-7957 BRIGAERTS, ROBERT V. CARDOZA, SHERIFF, ET AL. 91-7969 HOFFMAN, DENNIS D. V. UNITED STATES 91-7973 FRANKLIN, GEORGE T. V. OHIO 91-7979 CHASE, NORMAN K. V. BOARD OF PAROLE 91-8017 SINITO, THOMAS V. KINDT, WARDEN 91-8046 CLEMAS, THOMAS F. V. UNITED STATES 91-8054 THAKKAR, RAJESH V. DeBEVOISE, DICKINSON 91-8059 WEBB, JERRY L. V. UNITED STATES 91-8062 CASELLA, ANTONIO V. UNITED STATES 91-8073 LANDT, SARAH V. UNITED STATES 91-8085 CASTILLO-MORALES, JOSE V. IRS, ET AL. 91-8087 WINKLEMAN, STEVEN V. UNITED STATES 91-8088 TERRY, GAYLON C. V. UNITED STATES 91-8093 GARRETT, T. A. V. UNITED STATES 91-8098 WYATT, CASPER V. UNITED STATES 91-8107 GREEN, CYNTHIA K. V. UNITED STATES 91-8109 McLEOD, JOSEPH D. V. UNITED STATES 91-8113 BISHOP, WALTER L. V. UNITED STATES 91-8114 TALLMAN, MYRON V. UNITED STATES 91-8118 HARRIS, BILLY G. V. UNITED STATES 91-8120 TROUT, HOWARD N. V. UNITED STATES 91-8122 STUTTS, HENRY E. V. UNITED STATES 91-8125 CATES, EDWARD L. V. UNITED STATES 91-8135 ALLISON, ELMER D. V. UNITED STATES 91-8148 MATHENEY, ALAN V. INDIANA 91-8155 PEREZ-DOMINGUEZ, MANUEL V. UNITED STATES 91-8158 ELDER, BRENDA G. V. UNITED STATES 91-8159 FERRIOL, LOUIS V. UNITED STATES The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. 90-6315 PEREZ, RICKY V. LOUISIANA The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Blackmun, Justice O'Connor and Justice Souter would grant the petition, vacate the judgment and remand the case to the Supreme Court of Louisiana for further consideration in light of Foucha v. Louisiana, 503 U.S. ____ (1992). 91-1447 BINGHAM, WANDA V. INLAND DIV. OF GEN. MOTORS The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Blackmun would grant the petition, vacate the judgment and remand the case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of the 1991 Amendments to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(c). 91-1667 CENTRA, ETC., ET AL. V. McDONALD, CLIFTON, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice White would grant certiorari. MANDAMUS DENIED 91-7926 IN RE ARNETT LEE THOMAS The petition for a writ of mandamus is denied. REHEARINGS DENIED 91-7247 WILLIAMSON, RONALD K. V. OKLAHOMA 91-7648 ANDERSON, FREDERICK M. V. UNITED STATES 91-7655 LLOYD, JOHNNIE V. UNITED STATES The petitions for rehearing are denied. RECESS ORDER The Court will take a recess from Monday, June 1, 1992 until Monday, June 8, 1992. MOTIONS FOR ADMISSION The written motions for admission of the following lawyers to the Bar of this Court are granted: